Sunday, June 1 2025

A recent study conducted by media intelligence provider Carma has shed light on the influence of social media in fuelling boycotts against prominent global brands such as Starbucks, Disney, and Skechers in Malaysia and Indonesia. The research aims to provide insights for brands navigating similar crises.

The study delves into social media discussions and the narratives that shaped these boycotts, illustrating how netizens’ voices amplified calls for action. These online movements, sparked by conflicts in the Middle East, gained significant momentum as a form of social activism.

Platforms like X (formerly Twitter) became central in mobilizing the boycotts, with key movements such as the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) campaign, and hashtags like #BlockOut2024, dominating the discourse.

Volume Chart for conversations on Social Media

Starbucks became one of the primary targets following the controversy surrounding its Workers United union, which expressed support for Palestine on Twitter. After Starbucks pursued legal action against the union, demanding the tweet’s removal, the boycott escalated, gaining further traction in July 2024.

Social media users, especially in Malaysia and Indonesia, advocated switching to local coffee shops, emphasizing the preference for supporting local businesses over global corporations. The boycott also intertwined with a collaboration between Starbucks and Taeyang of the popular K-pop group BTS, with some fans urging BTS to withdraw from the partnership.

Top 10 Hashtags associated with Disney are related to boycott

Similarly, Disney faced backlash for its public pledge of US$2 million in support of Israel. This announcement drew criticism, particularly from BTS fans in Asia, who urged the group’s members Jimin and Jungkook to cancel their upcoming Disney show. Social media platforms in Indonesia were flooded with boycott-related hashtags, reaching a point where the top 10 hashtags associated with Disney were linked to the boycott.

Skechers also found itself embroiled in a boycott after its president, Michael S Greenberg, publicly declared support for Israel. Following a collaboration with the Olympic Council of Malaysia for the 2024 Olympics, Malaysian consumers expressed disappointment, leading to calls for a boycott of Skechers products.

However, the boycott’s momentum slowed after the brand partnered with ElleMen magazine, significantly altering public sentiment. According to Carma’s study, Skechers witnessed a 49% drop in negative sentiment after the collaboration.

Skechers

Jeremiah Rodrigues, General Manager of Malaysia and the Philippines at Carma, emphasized that brand reputation extends beyond public sentiment, highlighting the importance of understanding how media consumption influences perceptions. He stressed that during crises, this holistic understanding of media trends and audience sentiment is vital for brands to recover from boycotts effectively.

This study offers valuable insights for brands to better comprehend the power of social media in shaping consumer behavior and how strategic communication can help mitigate reputational damage in the face of boycotts.

Previous

Markets Rally on China’s Repo Rate Cut and Growth Optimism

Next

Pakistan's 3G/4G Users Surge, PTA Reports August Growth

About Author

Nizam Khaskheli

The author is a staff member and can be reached at nizam@madzine.pk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

WIDGETS ON SIDE PANEL

Don’t Miss

Indus Motors Company

Indus Motors Company Loses Embezzlement Appeal, Executive Acquitted

Nizam Khaskheli

In a significant blow to M/s Indus Motors Company Limited, the High Court of Sindh at Karachi today dismissed its appeal to overturn the acquittal of former senior executive Tariq Mehboob Cheema. Mr. Cheema, accused of criminal breach of trust and fraud causing losses of over Rs. 8.5 million, has been fully acquitted, with the […]

Priyanka Devi Acquitted in U.S. Visa Fraud Case: Court Cites Legal Flaws

Nizam Khaskheli

Today, the High Court of Sindh at Karachi acquitted Ms. Priyanka Devi of a conviction under Section 471 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), which pertains to using a forged document as genuine. The decision overturns an earlier judgment by the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Karachi (South), which had upheld Ms. Devi’s conviction but altered her […]

Beach Luxury Holdings

Beach Luxury Holdings merger greenlit by High Court

Nizam Khaskheli

In a significant move for the Pakistani corporate landscape, the High Court of Sindh, Karachi, has sanctioned a complex Scheme of Amalgamation involving Beach Luxury Holdings (Pvt.) Ltd. and its associated companies, Spencer & Company (Pvt.) Ltd. and Physons (Pvt.) Ltd.. The order, issued on April 24, 2025, by Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, approves a […]

National Foods Limited

National Foods Limited wins customs duty and sales tax exemption

Nizam Khaskheli

In a ruling that could ease the path for industrial development within its Special Economic Zones (SEZs), the High Court of Sindh at Karachi has sided with National Foods Limited, overturning earlier decisions that denied the company customs duty and sales tax exemptions on imported prefabricated building structures. The judgment, issued on May 12, 2025, […]

ICI Pakistan

ICI Pakistan reprimanded as court rejects photocopy evidence

Nizam Khaskheli

In a significant ruling handed down on February 17, 2025, the High Court of Sindh at Karachi dismissed an application by ICI Pakistan Limited (now Lucky Core Industries Ltd.) to introduce secondary evidence in a 2015 lawsuit seeking to recover over Rs. 26.5 million from Al Abid Silk Mills Limited. The court’s decision hinged on […]

Porsche wins $1.9M suit against Performance Automotive

Nizam Khaskheli

In a significant decision for international commerce and arbitration, the High Court of Sindh at Karachi has recognized and moved to enforce a foreign arbitral award in favor of Porsche Middle East and Africa FZE against Performance Automotive (Pvt.) Ltd.. The judgment, issued on May 19, 2025, by Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi, underscores Pakistan’s […]